The utility of all-freeze IVF cycles depends on the composition of study populations.

BACKGROUND: Because often introduced without proper validation studies, so-called "add-ons" to IVF have adversely affected in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes worldwide. All-freeze cycles (embryo banking, EB) with subsequently deferred thaw cycles are such an "add-on" and, because of greatly diverging reported outcomes, have become increasingly controversial. Based on "modeling" with selected patient populations, we in this study investigated whether reported outcome discrepancies may be the consequence of biased patient selection. RESULTS: In four distinct retrospective case control studies, we modeled in four cohort pairings how cryopreservation with subsequent thaw cycles affects outcomes differently in good-, average- and poor-prognosis patients: (i) 127 fresh vs. 193 frozen donor-recipient cycles to model best-prognosis patients; (ii) 741 autologous fresh non-donor IVF cycles vs. 217 autologous frozen non-donor IVF cycles to model average prognosis patients; (iii) 143 favorably selected autologous non-donor IVF cycles vs. the same 217 frozen autologous cycles non-donor to monitor good- vs. average-prognosis patients; and (iv) 598 average and poor-prognosis autologous non-donor cycles vs. the same 217 frozen autologous non-donor cycles to model poor vs. average prognosis patients. In best-prognosis patients, EB marginally improved IVF outcomes. In unselected patients, EB had no effects. In poor-prognosis patients, EB adversely affected IVF outcomes. Unexpectedly, the study also discovered independent-of-age-associated chromosomal abnormalities, a previously unreported effect of recipient age on miscarriage risk in donor-egg recipients. CONCLUSIONS: In poor-prognosis patients, EB cycles should be considered contraindicated. In intermediate-prognosis patients EB does not appear to change outcomes, not warranting additional cost and time delays. Therefore, only good-prognosis patients are candidates for EB, though they will experience only marginal benefits that may not be cost-effective.

Changing clinical significance of oocyte maturity grades with advancing female age advances precision medicine in IVF.

In current IVF practice, metaphase-2 (M2) oocytes are considered most efficient in producing good quality embryos. Maximizing their number at all ages is standard clinical practice, while immature germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes are mostly automatically discarded. We present preliminary evidence that oocyte maturity grades with advancing age significantly change in their abilities to produce good quality embryos, with M2 oocytes significantly declining, GV oocytes improving, and M1 oocytes staying the same. These data contradict the over-40-year-old dogma that oocyte grades functionally do not change with advancing age, supporting potential changes to current IVF practice: (1) Stimulation protocols and timing of oocyte retrieval can be adjusted to a patient's age and ovarian function. (2) In older and younger women with prematurely aging ovaries, GV oocytes may no longer be automatically discarded. (3) In some infertile women, rescue in vitro maturation of immature oocytes may delay the need for third-party egg donation.

A review of the 2021/2022 PGDIS Position Statement on the transfer of mosaic embryos.

The practice of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) since 2016 has been mostly directed by three highly controversial guidance documents issued by the Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Because these documents are so influential on worldwide IVF practice, the most recent one is here the subject of a detailed review, again revealing important misrepresentations and internal contradictions. Most importantly, however, this most recent guidance document still does not prevent the non-use and/or disposal of large numbers of embryos with substantial pregnancy and live-birth potential and, therefore, continues to propagate an IVF practice harmful to many infertile women.

Previously reported and here added cases demonstrate euploid pregnancies followed by PGT-A as "mosaic" as well as "aneuploid" designated embryos.

BACKGROUND: After the longest time opposing all transfers of embryos by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) diagnosed as "chromosomal-abnormal," the field has over recent years slowly been moving toward selective transfers of by PGT-A as "mosaic" diagnosed embryos, but is still rejecting transfers of embryos by PGT-A defined as "aneuploid." METHODS: Upon review of the literature, we report published cases of euploid pregnancies following transfers of PGT-A as "aneuploid" diagnosed embryos and add several additional, ongoing cases at our center. RESULTS: Among the published cases from our center, we identified seven euploid pregnancies from "aneuploid" embryos, four of which preceded the PGT-A industry's 2016 switch from binary "euploid" - "aneuploid" reporting to "euploid," "mosaic," and "aneuploid" reporting. That those four cases post 2016 PGT-A definition involving "mosaic" embryos, therefore, cannot be ruled out. Since then, we recently established three additional ongoing pregnancies from transfers of "aneuploid" embryos which still await confirmation of euploidy after delivery. A recent fourth pregnancy from the transfer of a trisomy 9 embryo miscarried before a fetal heart. Outside our own center's experience, the literature revealed only one additional such transfer, involving PGT-A as a "chaotic-aneuploid" diagnosed embryo with six abnormalities, leading to normal euploid delivery. In reviewing the literature, we furthermore demonstrate why current PGT-A reporting that differentiates between "mosaic" and "aneuploid" embryos based on relative percentages of euploid and aneuploid DNA in a single trophectoderm biopsy of on average 5-6 cells, is biologically non-sensical. CONCLUSION: Basic biological evidence and a clinically still very limited experience with transfers of PGT-A as "aneuploid" labeled embryos demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that at least some "aneuploid" embryos can lead to healthy euploid births. Therefore, this observation establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the rejection of all "aneuploid" embryos from transfer reduces pregnancy and live birth chances for IVF patients. Whether (and to what possible degree) pregnancy and live birth chances differ between "mosaic" and "aneuploid" embryos, remains to be determined. The answer will likely depend on the aneuploidy(ies) of an embryo and to what degree percentages of "mosaicism" in a single, on average 5/6-cell trophectoderm biopsy can reflect the ploidy-status of a complete embryo.

Reconsidering the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS).

Though likely the most common clinical diagnosis in reproductive medicine, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is still only poorly understood. Based on previously published research, and here newly presented supportive evidence, we propose to replace the four current phenotypes of PCOS with only two entities-a hyperandrogenic phenotype (H-PCOS) including current phenotypes A, B, and C, and a hyper-/hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), representing the current phenotype D under the Rotterdam criteria. Reclassifying PCOS in this way likely establishes two distinct genomic entities, H-PCOS, primarily characterized by metabolic abnormalities (i.e., metabolic syndrome) and a hyperandrogenic with advancing age becoming a hypoandrogenic phenotype (HH-PCOS), in approximately 85% characterized by a hyperactive immune system mostly due to autoimmunity and inflammation. We furthermore suggest that because of hypoandrogenism usually developing after age 35, HH-PCOS at that age becomes relatively treatment resistant to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and offer in a case-controlled study evidence that androgen supplementation overcomes this resistance. In view of highly distinct clinical presentations of H-PCOS and HH-PCOS, polygenic risk scores should be able to differentiate between these 2 PCOS phenotypes. At least one clustering analysis in the literature is supportive of this concept.

Jumonji Domain-containing Protein-3 (JMJD3/Kdm6b) Is Critical for Normal Ovarian Function and Female Fertility.

In females, reproductive success is dependent on the expression of a number of genes regulated at different levels, one of which is through epigenetic modulation. How a specific epigenetic modification regulates gene expression and their downstream effect on ovarian function are important for understanding the female reproductive process. The trimethylation of histone3 at lysine27 (H3K27me3) is associated with gene repression. JMJD3 (or KDM6b), a jumonji domain-containing histone demethylase specifically catalyzes the demethylation of H3K27me3, that positively influences gene expression. This study reports that the expression of JMJD3 specifically in the ovarian granulosa cells (GCs) is critical for maintaining normal female fertility. Conditional deletion of Jmjd3 in the GCs results in a decreased number of total healthy follicles, disrupted estrous cycle, and increased follicular atresia culminating in subfertility and premature ovarian failure. At the molecular level, the depletion of Jmjd3 and RNA-seq analysis reveal that JMJD3 is essential for mitochondrial function. JMJD3-mediated reduction of H3K27me3 induces the expression of Lif (Leukemia inhibitory factor) and Ctnnb1 (ß-catenin), that in turn regulate the expression of key mitochondrial genes critical for the electron transport chain. Moreover, mitochondrial DNA content is also significantly decreased in Jmjd3 null GCs. Additionally, we have uncovered that the expression of Jmjd3 in GCs decreases with age, both in mice and in humans. Thus, in summary, our studies highlight the critical role of JMJD3 in nuclear-mitochondrial genome coordination that is essential for maintaining normal ovarian function and female fertility and underscore a potential role of JMJD3 in female reproductive aging.

We have reached a dead end for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

The hypothesis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was first proposed 20 years ago, suggesting that during IVF elimination of aneuploid embryos prior to transfer will improve implantation rates of remaining embryos and, therefore, increase pregnancy and live birth rates, while also reducing miscarriages. Subsequently, unvalidated and increasingly unrestricted clinical utilization of PGT-A called for at least one properly randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess cumulative live birth rates following a single oocyte retrieval, utilizing all fresh and frozen embryos of an IVF cycle. Only recently two such RCTs were published, however both, when properly analysed, not only failed to demonstrate significant advantages from utilization of PGT-A, but actually demonstrated outcome deficits in comparison to non-use of PGT-A, when patient selection biases in favour of PGT-A were reversed. Moreover, because of high embryo mosaicism at the blastocyst stage and, therefore, high false-positive rates from trophectoderm biopsies, large numbers of chromosomal-normal embryos with normal pregnancy potential are unnecessarily left unused or discarded, indisputably causing harm to affected couples. We, therefore, strongly call for restricting PGT-A to only research protocols and, as of this point in time, encourage professional societies in the field to follow suit with appropriate practice guidelines.

Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice.

Ethical considerations are central to all medicine though, likely, nowhere more essential than in the practice of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Through in vitro fertilization (IVF), this is the only field in medicine involved in creating human life. IVF has, indeed, so far led to close to 10 million births worldwide. Yet, relating to substantial changes in clinical practice of IVF, the medical literature has remained surprisingly quiet over the last two decades. Major changes especially since 2010, however, call for an updated commentary. Three key changes deserve special notice: Starting out as a strictly medical service, IVF in recent years, in efforts to expand female reproductive lifespans in a process given the term "planned" oocyte cryopreservation, increasingly became more socially motivated. The IVF field also increasingly underwent industrialization and commoditization by outside financial interests. Finally, at least partially driven by industrialization and commoditization, so-called add-ons, the term describing mostly unvalidated tests and procedures added to IVF since 2010, have been held responsible for worldwide declines in fresh, non-donor live birthrates after IVF, to levels not seen since the mid-1990s. We here, therefore, do not offer a review of bioethical considerations regarding IVF as a fertility treatment, but attempt to point out ethical issues that arose because of major recent changes in clinical IVF practice.

Importance of IGF-I levels in IVF: potential relevance for growth hormone (GH) supplementation.

PURPOSE: Growth hormone (GH) supplementation in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) is worldwide again increasing, even though study outcomes have been discrepant. Since GH acts via insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), its utilization in IVF would only seem to make sense with low IGF-1. We, therefore, determined whether IGF-I levels affect IVF outcomes. METHODS: Retrospectively, 302 consecutive first fresh, non-donor IVF cycles were studied, excluding patients on GH supplementation. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups: IGF-1 in lower 25th percentile (group A, < 132 ng/mL, n = 64); 25th-75th percentile (B, 133-202 ng/mL, n = 164), and upper 25th percentile (C, > 202 ng/mL, n = 74). IGF-1 was tested immunochemiluminometric with normal range at 78-270 ng/mL. Because of the study patients' adverse selection and low pregnancy chances, the main outcome measure for the study was cycle cancellation. Secondary outcomes were oocyte numbers, embryos transferred, pregnancies, and live births. RESULTS: Group A was significantly older than B and C (P = 0.019). IGF-1 decreased with increasing age per year by 2.2 ± 0.65 ng/mL (P = 0.0007). FSH was best in group B and worst in A (trend, P = 0.085); AMH was best in B and worst in A (N.S.). Cycle cancellations were lowest in C (11.6%) and highest in A (25.0%; P = 0.042). This significance further improved with age adjustment (P = 0.021). Oocytes, embryo numbers, pregnancies, and live birth rates did not differ, though oocyte numbers trended highest in B. CONCLUSIONS: Here presented results support the hypothesis that IGF-1 levels affect IVF outcomes. GH treatments, therefore, may be effective only with low IGF-1.

The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies.

This analysis contrasts traditional not-for-profit academic with new corporate practices of reproductive medicine and offers an assessment of risks to quality of patient care with investors entering the for-profit reproductive medicine market. Large corporate enterprises may have a global impact on access to care while at the same time is putting at risk the training of the next generation of reproductive medicine specialists.

Transferring more than one embryo simultaneously is justifiable in most patients.

Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) was first introduced to IVF in 1999, and its subsequent integration into mainstream reproductive endocrinology and infertility has been hugely consequential. It can be viewed as the first (among many since) 'add-ons' to IVF that has significantly and adversely affected how IVF is practised, resulting in astonishing declines in live birth rates after fresh non-donor IVF cycles worldwide. We propose that, like most 'add-ons' to IVF over recent years, the almost universal use of eSET worldwide lacks proper validation of its underlying hypothesis and is based on statistically incorrect assumptions and incorrect data interpretation. As with most recent 'add-ons' to IVF, eSET lacks evidentiary support, and, therefore, its remarkable success in the marketplace must be based on expert opinions, the lowest level of evidence in medicine and widely recognized as frequently biased. Like other 'add-ons' to IVF, eSET-practice must be reassessed because it does not offer the benefits it has widely claimed to provide, prolongs time to conception and adversely affects live birth chances for many women. Moreover, by ignoring that infertile women value quick conception over most other considerations, provider-insistence on eSET frequently deprives them of the right to self-determination.